Comments by Slate McDorman
I am writing
this to share my thoughts on the controversy over the West
Fork bridge. My goal is not to create panic but to encourage thought of the
potential long-term costs associated with the decisions that will soon
be made.
For those of you who do not know, my family’s land sits adjacent the
western side of the bridge. Living so close, and with four generations
whom have lived here, we know much about the bridge’s history and
safety. Before this bridge, and even before highway 117, there was a
covered bridge that served as the main crossing for a hundred years
prior. The remaining pillars of this bridge lie in the water of the west
fork of Little River between Hwy 117 and Camp Laney. Similar to the
problem posed by the current bridge, the covered bridge lacked the
capacity to handle increasing traffic. It collapsed as a result of a car
and truck crossing over at the same time. A picture of the old crossing
in its glory days hangs as a memento on Dessie’s far wall.
I find the issues surrounding this old bridge strikingly similar to the
ones before us. Once again, we have a bridge on the west fork that was
not designed to handle the amount of traffic crossing it. Once again, it
is the same highway department coming to the rescue. We can only hope
this generation of ingenious engineers is more successful than their
predecessors have proven to be.
After the construction of the current bridge, around 1929 according to
my grandmother, my forefathers and I have witnessed this stretch of
highway develop into the hazardous roadway that it is today. In my
lifetime, I have seen countless wrecks as a result of the blind curve on
the east side of the bridge. Two years ago, my first Rescue Squad call
involved an accident there. While approaching the curve from the east
side of the bridge, a vehicle lost control on a patch of ice
--crashing into oncoming traffic. Late one summer night, I witnessed a
police chase ending with the criminal flipping his car as a result of
not slowing down for the curve. In last October’s horrific accident, the
force of the tractor-trailers colliding shook our home with the force of
an earthquake. Everything in the house (including me) bounced from its
proper place and rattled to a halt as my heart skipped a beat. Upon
saying all this, I hope it is obvious that we McDormans have a deep
interest in finding the best solution to the problem.
Yet, however important this issue is to my family and our community, the
curve and the bridge are only a symptom of a larger issue. This being
the continued unrestricted growth of Highway 117. This growth being due
to a large part the time it saves from Atlanta to Northeast Alabama. I
heard a scary rumor that fits in well in light of the proposed solution
to the current problem. The rumor is that there is a master plan on the
Georgia side to extend the highway of four lanes from Summerville to
Menlo. After this addition, the plan is to place three lanes from Menlo
to the state line. Then, the project will be picked up on the Alabama
side and will run three lanes across and down to the west side of the
mountain. Thus making a fast shortcut even faster.
Here, we have a puzzling mathematical twist of fate. If there were any
truth to this rumor, it would explain why a 40-foot bridge is being proposed
when each lane only needs to be 12 feet wide. Hence, at 12 feet there
can eventually be three lanes for a total road width of 36 feet with
four to spare. Things work out neatly if this rumor turns out to be
accurate.
So what are options to solve our problem? To begin with, most of my life
I’ve heard my family talk about a Fort Payne bypass that would relieve
the 117 Atlanta traffic by moving this somewhere south of Fort Payne. In
January, during the special town hall meeting to discuss the bridges, I
asked if there is any truth to this project. I was informed about a plan
that would run a major highway from somewhere north of Atlanta into Fort
Payne and beyond to Memphis. However, this project is scheduled to take
20-25 years to put in place. I did not receive the impression that this
Highway 35 project was of any immediate urgency. Yet, since there is
already a long-term plan in place, the question has been asked, “Why
spend money on this bridge project when it could be used to help make a
true solution a reality?” Further, if we are spending so much time and
effort to make Hwy 117 truck friendly and the route from Northern
Georgia to Alabama more efficient, will this development make it
unnecessary to expand 35? Is it Mentone’s destiny to become a sacrifice
to progress for
those who cannot wait for the Highway 35 expansion to become a reality?
Although the highway 35 project is the ideal long-term solution for our
town, it is unlikely to happen anytime soon. Different solutions
discussed so far for our immediate bridge dilemma:
1. Adjust the Speed Limit
2. Erect a Stoplight (or multiple Stoplights)
3. Re-designate Highway 117 as Desoto Parkway and Ban Trucks
4. Move the Bridge in order to Straighten Out the Curve
First, let’s explore the simplest and least expensive solution. In our
attempt to solve the Mentone dilemma of highway 117, we should consider
lowering the speed limit to 35 mph inside town limits. In optimistic
theory, if everyone drives at this reduced speed, the results of car
accidents would be far less severe. Also, the lower speed limit will deter
some of the commercial traffic.
Another practical option would be to (forgive my highway department
blasphemy) place a stoplight or stoplights in order to slow traffic.
This, in conjunction with lowering the speed limit, would put a serious
dent in traffic accidents as well as reduce tractor-trailer traffic.
However, both of these ideas have been disregarded by our highway
engineers --the same people who by their inaction let this situation
develop into what it is today. Their reason against the stoplight was,
“You don’t use traffic lights to control the speed limit. The results of
doing so are not pretty.” I find this answer interesting since this is
the same Highway Department that stated the way to control speeding on
US 280 through Birmingham was to use traffic lights. Their reason
against lowering the speed limit on 117, to my recollection, was that
they had not done a traffic study. The fact that no study has been
completed is bewildering given the increase in traffic, the rise in
dangerous accidents and the fact the highway department is about to
shell out several million dollars for a new bridge. We are, after all,
only talking about a mile and half road.
Another solution that should be explored is extending the designation of
Desoto parkway from Mentone to the state line. Once it is given this
designation, truck traffic can be limited to local deliveries only. To
this and to the majority of the ideas discussed at the town hall meeting,
the Highway Department reply was “We don’t need to be restrictive with
our highways. We must let other states know, Alabama is open for
business”. The question we must ask ourselves is, “Is Mentone for sale
to the interstate trucking industry?”
Last, and my personal least favorite idea, would be to expand the width
of the bridge. If we take this approach, the existing bridge will still
be standing, and a new bridge will be built beside it. There are two
proposed plans as to where this new bridge will go. One has the new
bridge upstream, which would significantly straighten the highway and
eliminate the curve. The other proposes to place the new bridge downstream.
The reason this river crossing is a problem is not because of the local population.
Normally, when roads are widened, it is to benefit the people living
around it. Unfortunately, the expansion will mainly benefit menacing
trucks that do not contribute a dime to our community. Our convenience
won’t be improved, and the ramifications would change the life in
Mentone as we know it. This looming development will eventually call for
more land and the death of many small businesses that dwell next to the
road. Revenue that tourists bring into the town will be lost, and our
quaint town will become nothing more than a ghost town. This commercial
truck route between northwest Georgia and northeast Alabama serves only
as a short cut that shaves a minute amount of time off of truckers’
trips.
Is it Mentone’s destiny to become nothing more than a short cut for the
masses? Why should we pay such a disproportional price for this so
called ‘progress’ that will bring more traffic and less money to our
town? We shouldn’t. It’s our job to stop this and protect our way of
life.
In conclusion, let me say that the problems before us are not ones I see
with any easy solutions. This is a battle between what we value as a
community versus what commerce values as an economic savings. If Mentone
is to retain the identity that we know and love, we and only we are the
ones who care enough to see that it stays this way.
Back to New Bridge Comments
Copyright © 2008 Skye Enterprises. All rights reserved.
|